|
Post by nordsohn on Dec 15, 2005 20:48:33 GMT 1
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass im Inneren der Digipackversion des neuen Albums nichtmehr wie bisher (und wie auch bei dem "Falkenbach" Schriftzug auf dem Rücken des neuen Shirts) die Runen des alten Futhark gebraucht werden, oder zumindest nicht mehr so, wie es noch auf dem alten Shirt war (zum Beispiel "Ingwaz" statt "Naudiz" für "n"). Ist zwar nichts weltbewegendes, aber mir ist es einfach aufgefallen und deshalb wollte ich wissen, ob es dafür einen speziellen Grund gibt. Danke schonmal für die Antworten. Useage of different runes I noticed that iniside the Digipack- Version of the new album there aren't used the runes of the elder Futhark (like for the "Falkenbach" print on the back of the the Shirt) or at least they are not used as before, on the old shirt (for example the "ingwaz" rune instead of the "naudiz" rune for "n"). That's not too special, I just noticed it and now I'm curious if there is a special reason for this. Thank you in advance for your answers.
|
|
|
Post by Vratyas on Dec 16, 2005 0:33:38 GMT 1
Napalm Records decided to assign a layouter for the digipack and created the whole layout without my "help", except for the frontcover. Unfortunately they used a different rune-set than the one Falkenbach used since the very beginning. You can find several further, pretty embarrassing mistakes on the whole digipack, which suck heavily as well.
|
|
|
Post by savagepitch on Dec 16, 2005 1:58:49 GMT 1
Why? Don't you have a say in what happens to the production of your own album?
|
|
|
Post by Vratyas on Dec 16, 2005 2:41:51 GMT 1
In the beginning, when the front cover was made, I´ve been in touch with the layouter and he created/changed the things the way I told him. Obviously this took too much time in the opinion of Napalm Records, as they said they had to hurry due to deadlines of important distibution partners and other &%$$% commercial aspects. You can be sure they´re not going to do something like that again, nor will I agree about any layouter they propose in the future. This time I wasn´t able to avert such a result as I did not expect something like that to happen, next time I´ll know better, as well as Napalm does.
|
|
|
Post by nordsohn on Dec 16, 2005 17:18:09 GMT 1
Now that you mentioned it I had a closer look and found more mistakes you were talking about. Too bad, an album this good deserves a packing without mistakes.
|
|
|
Post by Wotan on Dec 16, 2005 20:05:28 GMT 1
Now that you mentioned it I had a closer look and found more mistakes you were talking about. Too bad, an album this good deserves a packing without mistakes. That's true! I sign it!
|
|
|
Post by thorbjoern on Dec 23, 2005 23:54:53 GMT 1
hell ok i wondered allready about the 2 different rune-alphabets used on one single cd...... ähhm so f*ck off Philip Breuer^^
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 24, 2005 1:36:20 GMT 1
Philip Breuer worked on the booklet, not the digipack, and I think he did a great job.
|
|
|
Post by Wintersun on Dec 24, 2005 10:57:26 GMT 1
Yep the Booklet itself is great, Falkenbach's best until now I think
|
|